Sample dashboard

← Back to the Report

BID - Website design and development fits Summit Ridge Consulting's UI/UX and custom software lines and the work is remote-deliverable, but the 4 qualification documents must be read before committing.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS on the captured text. No on-site term appears and web work is remote-deliverable. The documents confirm it.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS.
• SAM.gov: PASS. No federal requirement shown. Summit Ridge Consulting's SAM.gov status is inactive.
• Verified MBE: PASS. No preference stated. The MBE certificate is expired and under renewal.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: PASS. No set-aside stated.
• State vendor registration: FAIL as a scored flag. Summit Ridge Consulting does not list Illinois. Clearing it means confirming the county's rule and registering.
• Past performance: unknown — need to confirm. Clearing it takes 2-3 verifiable web or UI/UX references.
• Key personnel or credentials: unknown — need to confirm.
• Clearance, CMMC, attestations: unknown — need to confirm.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting is a credible prime on scope. A lump-sum website project suits a small agile team working remotely. The unverified items are Illinois registration, local-government references and accessibility credentials.

Teaming case: HCH Enterprises adds MBE/DBE/SBE certifications, RI public-sector vehicles and hosting and DevOps capability. It lists no web design or accessibility service and has no Illinois presence, so it adds little. A third-party accessibility auditor is the only partner type that would be needed, and only if the documents demand certified auditing.

Win probability: roughly 20-25%. Evaluation criteria and weights are not visible. Points are won on relevant references, accessibility approach and lump-sum price. Points are lost on out-of-state location and thin local-government history. No wording in the captured text reads as written around an incumbent. Award value is not stated, so effort against value is unmeasured; a modest response fits the 3-week window.

Next actions:

← Back to the Report

BID — City of Buellton (CA) · Municipal Website Modernization and Redesign

Municipal Website Modernization and Redesign Project · Closes Friday, October 2, 2026, 4:00 PM PDT — 4 days A remote-deliverable website rebuild where the City's own Q&A accepts a custom open-source (WordPress) build and holds interviews and demos virtually; the risk is the four-day runway and the hard-copy delivery, not fit.

Facts

Scoring: Best value — Contractor Experience, Ability to Perform, Technical Approach, Cost. No weights published. Live (virtual) demonstration interview required for top vendors.

Scope match

Mandatory requirements Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet

None confirmed. Unknown — need to confirm: "Qualification to conduct business in the jurisdiction" and any California registration/licensing (Q&A #5 says secure it); three references with live URLs from the past five years of municipal/government work.

Gate checks

Prime case

Yes, if the proposal can be produced this week. Every core deliverable is web design and build, the City explicitly accepts a custom open-source build, and all interaction is virtual. The 15-page workbook limits writing effort.

Teaming case

Not needed to qualify. Use HCH Enterprises for WAF/managed hosting security and after-hours support coverage (confirm their terms), and 628 Digital Design for content, SEO and visual design. Subcontract the independent accessibility audit to a WCAG audit firm (Summit Ridge Consulting has no such partner today).

Win probability

Moderate-low. Competition will include municipal website product vendors (CivicPlus, Granicus, Revize-type platforms) whose demo and CA references score well; Summit Ridge Consulting gains on custom design and integrations, loses on municipal references. Effort ~3 person-days given the 15-page cap. Price the build fixed with written assumptions; price hosting/support, GIS and audit as separate lines.

Actions

Not read verbatim: RFP sections 4.1–6 (summary only) — verify minimum qualifications and submission instructions before submitting. Unknowns: CA registration requirement; exact minimum-experience wording; whether the e-submission request is granted.

← Back to the Report

BID — Centerville-Washington Park District (OH) · Website Redesign RFP 2027

Website Redesign (design, build, RecDesk integration, hosting and maintenance) · Closes October 12, 2026, 4:30 PM (ET implied) — 17 days A fully remote website rebuild with a real custom-integration core (RecDesk API program listings), no incumbent, equal-weighted criteria and email submission — a clean fit for Summit Ridge Consulting's web development and UX lines.

Facts

Scoring: All criteria weighted equally — project understanding, design quality, UX, municipal/park experience, CMS usability, RecDesk integration approach, accessibility expertise, SEO/performance, cost.

Scope match

Mandatory requirements Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet

None. Municipal/park experience is "not required but will be weighted more favorably" (unknown — need to confirm Summit Ridge Consulting examples). Three to five references preferred.

Gate checks

Prime case

Yes. Every workstream is a Summit Ridge Consulting deliverable, the RecDesk integration rewards engineering over templates, and equal weighting means cost is only one of nine criteria.

Teaming case

Optional: 628 Digital Design for visual design, translation strategy and SEO content support, and to broaden the portfolio/references.

Win probability

Moderate. Expect many web agencies (park-district sites draw Ohio and national shops). Points at risk: municipal/park experience. Points gained: RecDesk API approach (show the self-removing listing logic), accessibility plan, no-lock-in CMS. Effort ~4–5 person-days. Budget unknown — price the redesign in phases with written assumptions.

Actions

Sources read: RFP PDF, RFP notice page and the Q&A addendum on cwpd.org (text via cloud fetch). Not read: nothing outstanding. Unknowns: budget; time zone of the 4:30 PM deadline (ET implied); Ohio registration need.

← Back to the Report

BID - The scope is a custom web application, which is core Summit Ridge Consulting work, but the listing has no attachments, so eligibility terms must be confirmed from the RFQ documents before the 2026-10-23 close.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet: none found. The listing says "No files attached to this RFP," so the forms, references, key personnel and registration terms are unknown — need to confirm. If the RFQ includes a pass/fail criterion Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet, such as California registration, a verified MBE certificate or California references, that criterion ends the bid regardless of technical score.

Gate checks:

• On-site presence outside New England (hard disqualifier): PASS on available text. The work is a web application and no on-site duty is stated. Confirm in the RFQ documents.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS. Software development matches Summit Ridge Consulting's custom development line.
• SAM.gov: not stated. Summit Ridge Consulting's registration is inactive (expired 2024-05-31) and renewal continues.
• Verified MBE: not stated. Summit Ridge Consulting's MBE is expired and under renewal; HCH holds MBE.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: not stated.
• State vendor registration: unknown — need to confirm. California is not named in Summit Ridge Consulting's registered states.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting can deliver the entire build as prime: web application, data entry, batch upload, validation, query tools and role-based access. Summit Ridge Consulting has no California presence and no evidenced environmental-monitoring references. A narrow-scope prime bid is credible if the RFQ sets no California-specific hurdle.

Teaming case: HCH Enterprises adds MBE, DBE and SBE certifications, data engineering, cloud and DevOps, analytics and project management. HCH has no California vehicle and no environmental-monitoring past performance. The combined team still lacks aquatic survey domain experience and California references. A third partner, a California-based environmental data or fisheries science firm, is needed only if the RFQ scores domain experience.

Win probability: Low to moderate. Evaluation criteria are not visible. No wording reads as written around an incumbent, but the current vendor of the existing systems is unknown. Points are won on technical approach and price, and lost on California references and domain experience. The 16-day window suits a short quote, and delivery capacity is adequate.

Next actions:

1. Capture manager - Retrieve the full RFQ package and extract eligibility, on-site, registration, reference and evaluation terms - 2026-10-09
2. CEO - Check California supplier registration and MBE requirements, start registration if required, and sound out HCH on teaming - 2026-10-13
3. CEO - Make the final submit decision and submit the quote before the 3:00 PM PDT close - 2026-10-23

← Back to the Report

BID — City of Tecumseh Downtown Development Authority (MI) · Downtown Tecumseh Website RFP

Downtown Tecumseh Website Redesign — Development, Hosting & Management · Closes October 19, 2026, 3:00 PM ET — 24 days A small, remote-deliverable website build-plus-hosting job squarely in Summit Ridge Consulting's web development and UI/UX lines; the only real test is showing three comparable sites with events calendars and business directories.

Facts

Scoring: Understanding 15% · Design/UX 15% · CMS ease of use 15% · Experience 15% · Event and directory functionality 10% · Accessibility/SEO/mobile 10% · Hosting and support 5% · Information architecture 5% · Timeline/approach 5% · Cost 5%. Finalist interview/demonstration/presentation possible (format not stated).

Scope match

Mandatory requirements Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet

None are strictly mandatory. Unknown — need to confirm: three comparable completed sites (one with events calendar, one with business directory), each with URL, CMS, launch date and reference.

Gate checks

Prime case

Yes. Every scope item is a Summit Ridge Consulting web-development or UX deliverable, experience is only 15%, and cost is only 5%, so quality of concept and portfolio decide it. A preliminary homepage concept with the proposal is optional but will score on Design/UX.

Teaming case

Not needed to qualify. Use 628 Digital Design for homepage visuals, copy, SEO and Art Trail content if Summit Ridge Consulting's own portfolio lacks tourism/downtown sites; 628's portfolio can back the Design/UX score (confirm references).

Win probability

Moderate to good. Small Main Street job; competition will be regional web agencies. Points at risk: Experience (15%) if Summit Ridge Consulting lacks municipal/DDA sites; points gained with a strong concept and a clear no-lock-in hosting plan. Effort ~3–4 person-days. Keep the one-time build price modest and the annual hosting/support line clear.

Actions

Sources read: City bid page (mytecumseh.org) and the 16-page RFP PDF (text via a cloud fetch); Upscale Method aggregator summary. Not read: Addendum #1 — referenced but not posted. Unknowns: Addendum #1 content; budget; finalist format; number of copies.

← Back to the Report

BID - The AI Reporting Tool fits Summit Ridge Consulting's AI-native software and data reporting work, remote delivery is plausible, and no failed pass/fail requirement is visible, but the full RFP must be read before the question deadline.

Gate checks:

• On-site outside New England (hard disqualifier): PASS. No on-site requirement is stated. An on-site clause in the RFP would make this a FAIL.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS for the software scope. Hardware is excluded.
• SAM.gov, verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB: not applicable, none stated. SAM.gov is inactive and the MBE certificate is under renewal.
• State vendor registration: only Biddingo is stated. California is not on Summit Ridge Consulting's list.

Teaming case: HCH Enterprises adds data engineering, analytics, cloud, cybersecurity consulting, HIPAA-verified status and RI dashboard and KPI past performance. The team still lacks a Santa Clara County office, California references and hardware capability. If the City requires a licensed commercial product or local presence, a California-based software reseller or integrator is the third partner.

Win probability: About 15%. Award is best-value and non-price determinative, and the criteria are in the unseen documents. Sixty companies have taken documents, including resellers such as Carahsoft. No wording reads as written around an incumbent. Response effort is moderate and the award value is not stated.

Next actions: 2. Capture manager - Submit Q&A questions on remote delivery, build versus licensed product, budget and references - 2026-10-06 3. CEO - Record the Intent to Respond and upload the complete response with scan margin once the review clears - 2026-10-20

← Back to the Report

BID - This is a no-award RFI for a custom-buildable web platform, Summit Ridge Consulting is already a registered Colorado vendor, and the response window runs to 2026-10-22.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet: none found. The one mandatory item is a single Bid Documents file, which Summit Ridge Consulting can supply. Colorado vendor registration is not a stated requirement, and Summit Ridge Consulting holds it anyway. The detailed RFI document (cms-view.jsa) was not downloaded, so further requirements are unknown — need to confirm. Only the listing page was reviewed, and the memo quotes only that page.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS. No on-site work is stated for a software platform RFI. Confirm during the question window.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS. Custom software and UI/UX cover it.
• SAM.gov, verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE. None stated. Summit Ridge Consulting's SAM is inactive and its MBE is expired and under renewal, so renew both before any follow-on award.
• State vendor registration: PASS. Summit Ridge Consulting is registered in Colorado.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting is a credible prime respondent for a custom-built platform. It brings custom software, UI/UX, Agile delivery and a Colorado registration. It has no volunteer-management product and no volunteer-platform past performance to cite.

Teaming case: A partner is not required to answer an RFI. HCH Enterprises adds RI-based analytics, cloud and DevOps, and project management. Neither firm has a volunteer-management product. If a later procurement requires an established product, the team needs a SaaS volunteer-platform vendor.

Win probability: Not scorable. An RFI carries no award and no evaluation criteria are stated. The payoff is positioning for a follow-on solicitation. Effort is low, with one file and a short response. No wording in the available text reads as written around an incumbent. Delivery capacity fits a custom build.

Next actions: 2. Summit Ridge Consulting proposal lead - draft the custom-build response and decide on a SaaS partner - 2026-10-15

← Back to the Report

BID — Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District (WI) · Comprehensive AI Policy RFP

Comprehensive Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use and Governance Policy · Closes October 16, 2026, 4:00 PM CT — 21 days

Facts

Scoring (100): Qualifications & Experience 35 (public sector/utility 15; GenAI vs Operational AI 10; NIST AI RMF and Wisconsin public records 10) · Approach & Methodology 35 (discovery/audit 10; risk tiering and governance 10; compliance deliverables 10; training 5) · Schedule & Capacity 15 · Pricing 15 (cost/value 10; expense minimization 5).

Scope match

Mandatory requirements Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet

None pass/fail. Scored gaps: "up to four examples of past work—specifically highlighting any public sector AI policy, municipal governance, or utility technology frameworks" with costs (unknown — need to confirm Summit Ridge Consulting examples); at least 2 references.

Gate checks

Prime case

Yes. Scope maps to Summit Ridge Consulting's AI advisory and workshop lines; 35 points for approach and 15 for schedule reward a crisp phased plan, and remote delivery keeps expenses low (5 points). Weakest area: 15 points for public-sector/utility expertise.

Teaming case

Optional. HCH can add public-sector security/incident-response credibility for the Incident Response and Monitoring frameworks and its RI state-agency past performance. No partner adds wastewater-utility expertise; cite benchmarking against peer clean-water utilities instead.

Win probability

Moderate. Niche topic, likely a modest field of AI-policy consultancies and Big-4-style firms. Effort ~4 person-days for a 15-page response. Price as not-to-exceed by phase with a clear hours table; keep travel near zero.

Actions

Sources read: RFP PDF on madsewer.org (full text via cloud fetch); MMSD Contracting Center page; Starbridge listing. Not read: addenda — none found. Unknowns: budget; whether the listing's absence from the Contracting Center means it was pulled; Summit Ridge Consulting public-sector AI examples.

← Back to the Report

BID - A remote-deliverable municipal website build that fits Summit Ridge Consulting's UI/UX and web development lines, with no certification, bonding or on-site requirement stated.

Gate checks:

• Sustained on-site work outside New England (hard disqualifier): PASS. No on-site work is stated and the build is remote-deliverable. Confirm with the Town.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS.
• SAM.gov registration: PASS. Not stated, and SAM is inactive.
• Verified MBE certificate: PASS. Not stated.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: PASS. No set-aside stated.
• State vendor registration: PASS on the text. Virginia is not named in Summit Ridge Consulting's profile. unknown — need to confirm.
• Past performance: FAIL as a scored flag. The profile evidences no website project. Clearing it takes two or three web or UI/UX examples with client permission.
• Key personnel and credentials: PASS. None stated.
• Clearance, CMMC, attestation: PASS. None stated.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting can prime this. The scope is a standard design-and-build with a CMS handover. The risks are evidence of comparable work and the unnamed ADA standard. Summit Ridge Consulting has no Virginia presence, which costs points only if the Town favors local firms.

Teaming case: 628 Digital Design adds website design, SEO, maintenance and government client logos with no scope or year. HCH Enterprises adds nothing the RFP requests. A team would still lack Virginia presence and a scoped municipal reference. Teaming is optional, and no third partner is needed.

Win probability: Medium. Evaluation criteria and weights are not stated. Points are won on shown website work and an accessible-by-design approach, and lost on thin references and price. No wording reads as written around an incumbent. Effort is low, but the value is not stated, so price carefully. A team of 1-9 can deliver one town website. The proposal is physical, so shipping time matters.

Next actions:

1. Capture manager - Call the Town at 276-646-3232 for the full packet, question deadline, ADA standard, budget, eVA or license needs and time zone - 2026-10-21
2. CEO - Assemble two or three website or UI/UX examples and decide on adding 628 Digital Design for references - 2026-11-06
3. CEO - Send the signed hard-copy proposal by tracked courier to 325 East Lee Highway for arrival before the 2026-11-30 4:00pm deadline - 2026-11-23

← Back to the Report

BID - Narrow-scope prime bid on developer, business analyst and project manager roles; the master agreement is cheap to pursue, and no disqualifier fires.

Gate checks:

• Sustained on-site work outside New England (hard disqualifier): PASS. No on-site requirement is stated at the master level, and Summit Ridge Consulting can decline calls that require it.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL. Clear it by checking only the three GREEN/AMBER roles.
• SAM.gov, verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE. None is required in the provided text.
• State vendor registration: PASS. Summit Ridge Consulting is registered in Wyoming.
• Past performance: FAIL. The profile lists no references. Clear it by documenting two or three projects.
• Clearance, CMMC or compliance attestation: PASS. None is required beyond WCAG 2.1 AA, US-only staffing, AI disclosure and NDA.

Win probability: Moderate for MSA qualification, because the award creates a pool of vendors. The master scoring criteria sit in the RFP PDF, which was not provided. At Resource Call stage the State scores experience, resumes, value added and interviews, with cost as pass/fail. It also warns that "Generic boilerplate or experience unrelated to this specific Resource Call request will not receive full credit." No incumbent-specific wording was found. Effort is modest against an indefinite-quantity vehicle of unstated value. The risk is capacity to field named candidates within a 14-day call window.

Next actions: 3. CEO - Set NTE rates for three roles, assemble resumes, references, good-standing proof and the Section 9 signature page, and upload as separate files - 2026-11-10

← Back to the Report

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• The vendor must supply a working NBS LIMS that integrates with 10+ instrument platforms at 130,000+ samples a year. Summit Ridge Consulting has no such product or reference. This is a pass/fail responsibility, and one failed pass/fail requirement ends the bid regardless of any other strength.
• The 4 listed documents and the 36-item request list were not available for review. Any further forms, references or key persons are unknown — need to confirm.

Gate checks:

• On-site work outside New England (hard disqualifier): PASS. None stated; delivery location beyond Denver County is unknown — need to confirm.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL. A clinical LIMS is outside all six lines.
• Past performance: FAIL. No LIMS or lab reference exists. Clearing it takes a LIMS vendor partner.
• Colorado vendor registration: PASS.

Teaming case: HCH adds analytics, data engineering, project management, HIPAA verification and Massachusetts public-health technology experience. Summit Ridge Consulting adds reporting, UI/UX and AI workflow work. The pair still has no LIMS, no instrument interfaces and no NBS reference. A third partner is required: an established public-health LIMS vendor, who would be the prime. Summit Ridge Consulting would hold a minor subcontract at best.

Win probability: Very low. Evaluation criteria are not stated, and no incumbent-targeted wording appears. An RFI carries no award and no stated value. Summit Ridge Consulting would lose on capability and product fit, so the response effort has no payoff.

Next actions: 2. Capture manager - Skip the question submission unless the documents show a reporting-only lot; deadline is 4:00 PM EDT - 2026-10-09 3. Capture manager - Follow the solicitation for addenda through close and watch for the follow-on RFP, then approach a LIMS vendor as prime for a reporting subcontract - 2026-11-02

← Back to the Report

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• A deliverable platform ready for 2027-01-01. We have no product. If the RFP scores this pass/fail, it ends the bid.
• Special education past performance. We have none, and HCH's references are public health and Medicaid analytics.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS. Work is in Massachusetts.
• Scope outside six service lines: FAIL. Clearing it takes a platform-vendor partner.
• SAM.gov, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB, verified MBE: NOT APPLICABLE. None is stated. Our MBE certificate is expired and in renewal.
• State vendor registration: NOT APPLICABLE as stated; unknown - need to confirm, since we are not registered in Massachusetts.
• Past performance: FAIL. Clearing it takes a partner with K-12 special education references.
• Key personnel and compliance attestations: NOT APPLICABLE as stated; unknown - need to confirm.

Prime case: Low. We have no platform, no special education references, and no Massachusetts vendor registration. A custom build cannot be delivered and trained by the start date.

Teaming case: HCH adds analytics, data engineering, cybersecurity, HIPAA-verified security, program management, and Massachusetts presence. The team still has no platform, no special education references, and no case management product, which HCH lists as known gaps. A third partner is required: an established special education or IEP software vendor to prime. We have no such partner, and a teaming agreement cannot be built before 2026-10-08.

Win probability: Low. Evaluation criteria are not stated. Finalists are interviewed, and finalists will be established platform vendors. No wording in the advertisement reads as written around an incumbent. Response effort is high: two sealed envelopes filed in person by 4:00 p.m. on 2026-10-08, against an undisclosed value and a product we cannot show.

Next actions: 2. Capture manager - request the RFP packet from Leah Arredondo and register as an interested vendor to resolve the unknown terms - 2026-10-05

← Back to the Report

NO GO - Broome County is buying a landfill scale-management product that neither Summit Ridge Consulting nor HCH has, under an all-or-none award with physical submission due in 26 days.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Proven deployed landfill scale-management product with references. Neither Summit Ridge Consulting nor HCH evidences one. If the RFP makes this pass/fail, it ends the bid.
• All-or-none award: the vendor must deliver every line, including scale hardware integration, which neither firm supplies.
• The RFP document and the 38-item document request list were not provided, so further requirements are unknown — need to confirm.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS on the evidence. The system is cloud-hosted and no sustained on-site work is stated. Installation terms are unknown — need to confirm.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL. A packaged landfill product is not custom development, AI or advisory work.
• Active SAM.gov: NOT APPLICABLE. County procurement.
• Verified MBE: PASS. No MBE requirement is stated.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE.
• State vendor registration: FAIL. New York is not on Summit Ridge Consulting's list. Clear it by confirming the requirement with the buyer and registering.
• Past performance: FAIL. No landfill references. Clear it only with a partner that has them.
• Key personnel: NOT APPLICABLE. None stated. Unknown — need to confirm.
• Clearance or compliance attestation: NOT APPLICABLE.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting would build a landfill scale and billing system from scratch with no waste-industry references and no hardware integration experience. The county is buying a proven system, so a first-of-kind build loses on references and delivery risk.

Teaming case: HCH adds cloud, DevOps, data engineering and project management. Its Rhode Island and Massachusetts vehicles carry no weight in a New York county procurement. The pair still lacks a deployed landfill scale product, scale hardware integration and waste-industry references. A third partner must be an established landfill scale-software vendor, and Summit Ridge Consulting would be a minor subcontractor with little margin.

Next actions:

← Back to the Report

Caveat: only the SAM.gov portal summary was readable. The full solicitation documents were not available, so scope and requirement calls rest on the title, codes and dates.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Active SAM.gov registration. Summit Ridge Consulting's registration expired 2024-05-31 and the profile states it is not eligible for federal award until renewed. This is a pass/fail requirement and it ends the bid.
• All other submission requirements (forms, references, key personnel, certifications) are unknown - need to confirm from the full documents.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, on-site work outside New England: NOT APPLICABLE. Place of performance is not stated. Unknown - need to confirm.
• Scope outside six service lines: FAIL. Clearing it needs an authorized provider of the branded program as partner.
• Active SAM.gov registration: FAIL. Clearing it needs a completed renewal, which cannot be assured by 2026-10-06.
• Verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE. Set-aside field is blank. MBE is expired and in renewal.
• State vendor registration: NOT APPLICABLE. Federal buy.
• Past performance, key personnel, clearance or CMMC: NOT APPLICABLE. Not stated. Summit Ridge Consulting lists no training-delivery references. Unknown - need to confirm.

Prime case: Not viable. SAM is inactive, scope matches none of the six service lines, the window is 5 days, the value is not stated and Summit Ridge Consulting has no listed training references.

Teaming case: HCH Enterprises lists security awareness training, contact tracer training and program management. It lists no leadership or productivity curriculum and no VA vehicle. The pair still lacks an authorized provider of the branded program. A third partner would need to be an authorized reseller or certified facilitator of that program. HCH's SAM status is unknown - need to confirm.

Win probability: Low. The SAM cap on Win Confidence applies. Evaluation criteria were not readable. The title "CRUCIAL LEARNING-GETTING THINGS DONE" reads as a brand-name buy, which favors an authorized reseller or incumbent. Effort against odds is poor.

Next actions: 2. Capture lead - Download the full attachments and confirm set-aside, place of performance and brand-name terms for the file - 2026-10-05 3. Operations lead - Complete SAM.gov renewal and the MBE certifier confirmation for future federal bids - 2026-10-06

← Back to the Report

NO GO — U.S. FDA (HHS) · RFP 75F40126R00097

ThinkTrends Software Implementation and Support (IDIQ) · Closes September 28, 2026, 1:00 PM EDT — 3 days A federal award needs an active SAM.gov registration, which Summit Ridge Consulting does not have, and the work is built around a proprietary platform (ThinkTrends) Summit Ridge Consulting has never implemented.

Facts

Scoring: Not stated in the material read.

Scope match

Mandatory requirements Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet

1. Active SAM.gov registration at offer/award — Summit Ridge Consulting's is inactive since 5/31/2024.
2. Rights, licenses and access to the ThinkTrends platform ("the contractor shall obtain and maintain all rights, licenses, permissions") — none today.

Gate checks

Prime case

No. SAM is inactive, and the incumbent-shaped requirement (existing FAERS, BEST and Site Selection ThinkTrends tools) favours a firm already inside that environment.

Teaming case

HCH (SeaPort NxG, FAA eFAST, HHS-adjacent program work) could add federal credibility, but neither firm has ThinkTrends experience. The needed partner type is a ThinkTrends reseller/implementation partner.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: SAM.gov notice page (full description, classification, attachments list). Not read: ThinkTrends SOW.pdf and Attachment 1 Pricing Worksheet.xlsx — download consent needed and the SAM gate decides it. Unknowns: contract ceiling, period of performance, place of performance.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Haralson County (GA) · Outsourced Managed IT RFP

Request for Proposal – Outsourced Managed IT ("IT RFP 2026 Proposal") · Closes October 27, 2026, 12:00 PM EST — 29 days

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

HCH Enterprises covers managed IT and cyber, but its footprint is RI/MA and the weekly Georgia site visits plus GCIC certification are gaps neither firm fills. Not a TEAM filing.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: full 10-page RFP PDF.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Village of Indian Head Park (IL) · Managed IT Services RFP

Request for Proposal for Managed Information Technology Services · Closes August 12, 2026, 10:00 AM CT (per RFP schedule) — closed

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

HCH has managed IT but not an Illinois footprint or confirmed municipal/CJIS references. Not pursued.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: bid listing, RFP PDF (first 8 pages verbatim, rest via fetch summary), Addendum No. 1. Due date corrected from the dashboard's null to Aug 12, 2026 from the RFP schedule.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of Burbank (IL) · RFP 2026-HRIS-01

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: bid page, RFP v4.2 (partly summary), Addendum 6. Not read: Addenda 1–5, 7 (don't change a product purchase).

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The work fits Summit Ridge Consulting's web and UX lines, but the proposal closes 2026-10-08 and the RFP package was never read, so pass/fail requirements cannot be checked and a compliant response cannot be built in one day.

Caveat: only the portal summary was available. The ZIP attachment was not opened. Every item marked "unknown" must be confirmed in the RFP.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• The full submission requirements are unread, so every pass/fail item is unknown - need to confirm. One failed pass/fail requirement ends the bid regardless of technical score.
• Local-government website references: none are evidenced in the Summit Ridge Consulting profile.
• California vendor registration: California is not on Summit Ridge Consulting's registered list.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, on-site work outside New England: NOT APPLICABLE. No on-site requirement is stated; unknown - need to confirm.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS. Hosting is the only stretch.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting delivers design, build and UX directly. It lacks hosting, public-sector website references and a confirmed California registration. A compliant prime response cannot be produced in the time left.

Teaming case: HCH Enterprises adds hosting capability (cloud, DevOps, managed IT), cybersecurity and MBE/DBE/SBE status. It shows no public-sector website past performance, and its footprint is RI and MA. The team still cannot show California agency website references. A third partner, a government web agency with municipal CMS references, would be needed if references are scored. A teaming agreement cannot be negotiated in one day.

Win probability: Low. Evaluation criteria and weights are unknown. The summary contains no wording that reads as written around an incumbent. Public website RFPs usually reward local references and portfolio, where Summit Ridge Consulting has no evidenced edge. Proposal effort is large against an unstated value and a one-day window. Delivery capacity for a remote build is adequate.

Next actions:

1. Capture manager - request ZIP access and read the RFP for pass/fail items, on-site terms and closing time - 2026-10-07
2. CEO - contact SJCOG Contract Specialist Gabby Zamora about an extension or addendum ahead of the 2026-10-08 close - 2026-10-07
3. Capture manager - add SJCOG to the pre-RFP watchlist and restart the screen with HCH on hosting if the RFP is extended or reissued - 2026-10-08

← Back to the Report

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Johnson County qualification: unknown — need to confirm. The Edgerton Business License is required "prior to beginning work," so Summit Ridge Consulting can obtain it after award. It does not end the bid on its own.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS. The work is remote-deliverable.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS. Codification and SEO are AMBER stretches.
• SAM.gov, verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE.
• State registration: FAIL. Summit Ridge Consulting is Kansas-registered but holds no City business license. Clear it by applying to the City.
• Past performance: FAIL. Clear it with a municipal reference.
• Clearance or compliance attestation: PASS.

Teaming case: HCH adds cybersecurity, managed support, hosting and cloud. HCH has no municipal website or codification record. The team still lacks a codification platform and municipal references, so a third partner is needed: a code publisher or municipal-web specialist. The City must approve any subcontractor, and the budget cannot carry two firms.

Win probability: Low. Points go to CMS usability, municipal experience, features, approach and cost. Summit Ridge Consulting loses on municipal experience and codification. Short-listed firms must run a live CMS demonstration, including an emergency alert. The wording does not read as written around an incumbent. Sixteen days of proposal effort for under $30,000 is poor value.

Next actions: 2. Capture manager - Email Kara Banks on Johnson County qualification and the Edgerton Business License - 2026-10-12 3. CEO - Reopen the bid only if the first two answers are clean and a municipal reference and codification partner are named; the proposal is due 2026-10-22 - 2026-10-14

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of San Carlos (CA) · Enterprise Asset Management / Work Order / CIP RFP

Enterprise System for Asset Management, Work Order, and CIP Project Management · Closes October 22, 2026, 3:00 PM PDT — 24 days The City will only buy a COTS, fully SaaS asset-management system already in use by similar agencies, with on-site demonstrations in California.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

None — needs an EAM software publisher.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: bid detail page and RFP PDF (partly via fetch summary).

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of Lemoore (CA) · Municipal Branding Services RFP

Municipal Branding Services (city seal, logo, mission/vision, slogan, style guide) · Closes Thursday, October 1, 2026, 2:00 PM (PT) — 3 days Municipal identity and branding with community focus groups in California is outside Summit Ridge Consulting's six service lines, and the three-day runway with hard-copy delivery leaves no room to team.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. No part of the scope is a Summit Ridge Consulting service line.

Teaming case

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: RFP PDF (full text via unattended fetch). No addenda or Q&A were linked.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Municipality of Anchorage, AK (Purchasing Department) · RFP 2026P044

Customer Information Billing System Replacement · Closes October 16, 2026 (time not stated) — 21 days Replacing a municipal utility customer information and billing system (CIS) is a large commercial-product purchase and implementation; Summit Ridge Consulting has no CIS product and no utility-billing past performance.

Facts

Scoring: Not stated in the material read.

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

No current partner has a CIS product. The vendor type needed (utility CIS provider or systems integrator) would prime.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: Summit Ridge Consulting dashboard row and Bid Express page (sign-in wall). Not read: RFP documents — Bid Express login required; the out-of-scope product fast kill decides it. Unknowns: value, term and budget not stated.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Columbus Consolidated Government (GA) · RFP 27-0008

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System · Closes Wednesday, October 14, 2026, 5:00 PM ET (Addendum 1) — 16 days A COTS ERP replacement for CGI Advantage with a software license agreement and system demos — a product purchase Summit Ridge Consulting cannot supply.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

None — needs an ERP publisher or certified implementer.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: RFP 27-0008 PDF (partly via fetch summary), bid page, Addendum 1.

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The RFP buys a hosted vital records SaaS product with STEVE integration, and Summit Ridge Consulting has no such product, no comparable reference and no Pennsylvania registration.

Caveat: only the portal summary was available. The full RFP documents were not read.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Vital records SaaS product and comparable past performance: neither Summit Ridge Consulting nor HCH lists one. If the RFP makes this pass/fail, it ends the bid.
• Pennsylvania vendor registration: Summit Ridge Consulting is not registered in Pennsylvania. The JAGGAER profile is required.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, on-site work outside New England: not determinable. The delivery location is statewide Pennsylvania and the product is web-based. Unknown — need to confirm.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL. Clearing it takes a vital records SaaS prime.
• State vendor registration: FAIL. Clearing it takes Pennsylvania and JAGGAER registration.
• Past performance: FAIL. Clearing it takes a prime with statewide vital records deployments.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting scores poorly as prime. It has no product, no STEVE experience, no registration and no reference. A pass/fail experience requirement ends the bid.

Teaming case: Summit Ridge Consulting adds portal build, UI/UX and workflow automation. HCH adds HIPAA verification, cybersecurity, data engineering, project management and MA ITS75 public health technology. The team still lacks a certified vital records SaaS product and STEVE integration. A third partner is required: an established vital records SaaS vendor serving as prime. Summit Ridge Consulting would hold a small subcontract at best.

Next actions:

1. CEO - confirm NO GO as prime and skip the RSVP - 2026-10-13
2. Capture manager - read the full RFP in JAGGAER and confirm the NO GO holds - 2026-10-15
3. Capture manager - ask HCH for a vital records SaaS prime seeking a Rhode Island web and UI/UX subcontractor; pursue only on a written commitment - 2026-10-15

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The RFP requires at least two website-services references with full contact details, the profile evidences none, and one failed pass/fail requirement ends the bid.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• "References: Please provide the name, telephone number, email, and physical address of at least two references" for whom website services were provided. Addendum No. 1 accepts out-of-state references, but the profile lists no reference. This is pass/fail and ends the bid.

Gate checks:

• On-site presence outside New England (hard disqualifier): PASS. The work is a remote-capable website project and no on-site presence is stated.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS. Hosting and the .gov transition are AMBER.
• SAM.gov, verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB, clearance or compliance attestation: NOT APPLICABLE. None is stated.
• Past performance: FAIL. Two references are required and none is evidenced. Clearing it takes two real website-services clients who agree to take the Village's call.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting fits the rebuild, migration and launch. Hosting, .gov handling and ongoing security are thin. The reference requirement fails on the evidence today, so the prime case fails.

Teaming case: HCH adds hosting, managed services and security. HCH has no website-services past performance, so the combined team still cannot evidence two references. A third partner, an established government web agency with local-government website references, would be needed, and that partner would take the prime role.

Win probability: Low. The Village scores experience on similar projects, estimated cost and timeline. Points are won on local-government references and a short schedule. Summit Ridge Consulting loses on references and has no NC presence. The RFP names no incumbent. The response effort is small, but the odds without references are near zero.

Next actions: 3. Capture manager - ask HCH whether it holds website references and would host and secure the site; send the signed PDF proposal only if references are confirmed - 2026-10-14

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Town of Cohasset (MA) · Municipal Meeting Minute Tool/Application

Bulletin: Municipal Meeting Minute Tool/Application (request for quotes / letters of interest) · Closes July 9, 2026, 2:00 PM — letters of interest closed (listing: "Open Until Contracted") The letter-of-interest deadline passed in July, and the Town is quoting an existing application with an optional recorder app — a product purchase, not a build.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

None needed. If Summit Ridge Consulting ever productizes an AI minutes tool, a New England town like Cohasset would be a pilot prospect — outside this solicitation.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: bid list, bid detail (bidID=75) and the one-page public notice. Due date corrected from the dashboard's null to July 9, 2026. COMMBUYS listing not checked.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of Yorba Linda (CA) · Integrated Library System RFP

Yorba Linda Public Library – Integrated Library System (ILS) · Closes September 29, 2026, 5:00 PM (PT) — 1 day This is the purchase of an established SaaS library system with migration from SirsiDynix Horizon — a product Summit Ridge Consulting doesn't have and no partner supplies.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

None. The gap is an ILS product vendor (e.g., a library-systems SaaS company); no current partner fills it.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: City bid posting page (fast kill; RFP PDF and Addendum 1 not read — the listing itself defines a SaaS product purchase).

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Maine State Housing Authority (MaineHousing) · 2026 RFP for Energy Assistance & Weatherization Software

Energy Assistance and Weatherization Software · Closes October 16, 2026, 5:00 PM ET — 21 days MaineHousing is buying an existing, demo-ready HEAP/Weatherization product for 65,000+ applications a year, with a DOE-approvable audit tool and three references from clients who have had the product in production for two years — Summit Ridge Consulting has no such product.

Facts

Scoring: Ability to meet requirements 30 · Pricing 20 · Qualifications/past performance 15 · Completeness 15 · Implementation plan 15 · Smaller programs (Lead, HARP) 5.

Scope match

Mandatory requirements Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet

1. Three references from clients running the vendor's software in production for at least two years.
2. Demonstration of the vendor's software (Oct 19–30).
3. DOE-approvable weatherization audit tool before launch.
4. SOC 2 Type II (or equivalent) on request.

Gate checks

Prime case

No. A custom build cannot reach DOE approval and production scale by July 1, 2027, or supply the required production references.

Teaming case

HCH (health and human services program work, security) does not have a LIHEAP/WAP product either. The needed partner type is an established energy-assistance software vendor, which would prime.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: MaineHousing RFP listing page and the RFP PDF pages 1–19 verbatim (cloud text fetch); appendices D–E via summary only. Not read: Q&A (due Oct 9) — cannot change the product-purchase verdict.

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The City is buying a finished volunteer management software product, Summit Ridge Consulting has no such product, the window is six days, and mandatory references cannot be evidenced.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• References are a mandatory upload. The profile holds no comparable references. If the RFP treats references as pass/fail, that ends the bid regardless of technical score.
• The 3 RFP attachments were not available for review, so evaluation criteria and contract terms are unknown — need to confirm.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, on-site work outside New England: PASS. The product is web-based and no on-site work is stated. The attachments are unreviewed.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL (flag). Clearing it needs an owned volunteer management product or a partner who owns one.
• Past performance: FAIL (flag). Clearing it needs three verifiable comparable references.
• SAM.gov, verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE, none stated.
• State registration, key personnel, clearance or compliance attestation: NOT APPLICABLE as stated; unreviewed documents leave these unknown — need to confirm.

Teaming case: HCH adds hosting, managed services, help desk and project management. HCH has no volunteer software product, and its Rhode Island vehicles carry no weight in California. The team still lacks a product and references. A third partner would have to be a volunteer-management SaaS vendor, which would bid as prime and leave Summit Ridge Consulting a minor role.

Win probability: Under 5%. Points will go to product fit, references and the SLA, where Summit Ridge Consulting is weakest. No incumbent-specific wording appears. The effort is a full two-envelope response in six days for a small deployment of about 13 users.

Next actions:

← Back to the Report

NO GO - Electronic security systems work at unnamed CONUS and OCONUS sites is outside all six service lines and outside New England, and the client's SAM.gov registration is inactive.

Caveat: only the SAM.gov portal summary was readable. The solicitation attachments were not available, so evaluation criteria, bonding, clearance and set-aside terms are unconfirmed.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Active SAM.gov registration. The client's registration expired 2024-05-31 and the client is ineligible for federal award. This is a pass/fail requirement and it ends the bid.
• Electronic security past performance, bonding, clearances and licensed technicians: unknown - need to confirm. The client profile shows none of them.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: FAIL. Sites are "Various locations both CONUS and OCONUS" and none is committed to New England. This forces the verdict.
• Scope outside the six service lines: FAIL. Clearing it takes a physical security integrator partner.
• Active SAM.gov registration: FAIL. Clearing it takes completed renewal; timing against 2026-10-30 is unconfirmed.
• Verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE on the visible record; no set-aside is stated. Unknown - need to confirm.
• State vendor registration: NOT APPLICABLE. Federal solicitation.

Prime case: The client fails as prime. It has no SAM.gov eligibility, no electronic security capability, no federal or OCONUS field workforce, and no service line that maps to PSC J059 work.

Win probability: Near zero. Evaluation criteria were not readable. The "VIII" in the title marks a long-running program series, which signals entrenched integrators; no incumbent-specific wording could be quoted because the documents were unavailable. Response effort is high against an unstated value, and the client has no delivery capacity for this scope. The SAM.gov lapse alone caps federal win confidence at Low.

Next actions: 2. Capture lead - Pull the SAM.gov attachments and confirm place of performance, set-aside, bonding and clearance terms for the record - 2026-10-15

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The City of Sumner website RFQ closed at 2:00 p.m. on August 31, 2026, and Summit Ridge Consulting cannot show the municipal website and accessibility track record the RFQ scores.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• The 2:00 p.m. August 31, 2026 deadline has passed. This pass/fail requirement ends the bid.
• Past projects from the last five years with references and phone numbers: none evidenced.
• Resumes for up to three key team members: none named in the profile.
• Accessibility expertise (WCAG 2.1 AA, ADA Title II, Section 508, OCIO): none evidenced.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS. No on-site work is required, and interviews can be virtual. Confirm with the City.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL. Accessibility audits, CMS and hosting need partners.
• SAM.gov: PASS. It is not required. Summit Ridge Consulting's status is inactive.
• Verified MBE: PASS. It is not required.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: PASS. No set-aside is stated.
• Washington vendor registration: NOT APPLICABLE. Unknown — need to confirm.
• Past performance: FAIL. Clearing it takes three verifiable website references.
• Clearance, CMMC, attestation: PASS. None are stated.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting is strong on design and development and weak on the rest. Three of seven criteria test accessibility expertise Summit Ridge Consulting cannot show. With no municipal reference and a missed deadline, the prime case fails.

Teaming case: HCH Enterprises adds cybersecurity, managed IT, cloud and project management. HCH shows no website, CMS or accessibility record. The team still lacks a municipal website reference and WCAG audit credentials. A third partner would be an accessibility specialist with government website references. Teaming does not recover the missed deadline.

Win probability: Very low. Points are won on municipal experience, accessibility, CMS and references, and Summit Ridge Consulting is weak on all four. No incumbent-specific wording appears. The response effort is modest, but the window is closed. Delivery capacity for a one-year build in Washington is unproven.

Next actions:

1. Capture manager - Email Carmen Palmer to ask whether late SOQs are accepted after August 31, 2026 and whether a maintenance-plan RFQ is coming - 2026-10-09
2. CEO - Ask HCH Enterprises for government website or accessibility references - 2026-10-16

← Back to the Report

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Supplying a SaaS GRC product. The solicitation calls for a Provider of a SaaS GRC solution. If this is pass/fail, it ends the bid, and the client has no such product.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS. No on-site requirement is stated and the scope is remote-capable on its face. Confirm in the SOQ document.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL. Clearing it takes a GRC software publisher or reseller as prime or named partner.
• SAM.gov, verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE on the captured text. No requirement is stated. Confirm in the SOQ document.
• State vendor registration: PASS. Colorado is on Summit Ridge Consulting's registered list.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting fails the core requirement. It has no GRC product, no GRC implementation reference and no OneTrust migration experience. Colorado registration is in place, but the product gap decides it.

Teaming case: HCH adds cybersecurity consulting, policy development, project management, data engineering, and MBE, ISO 9001 and HIPAA credentials. Summit Ridge Consulting adds custom integration and AI workflow automation. The team still lacks the GRC platform. A third partner is required: a GRC software publisher or authorized reseller. None is identified, and ten days remain with questions closed.

Win probability: Very low. Evaluation criteria, weights and incumbent-favoring language are not in the captured text. The buyer names OneTrust as the system in place, so it knows the GRC market, and established GRC vendors hold the product advantage. A product-led SOQ of unknown value costs real effort against near-zero odds. The combined team has no capacity to deploy a GRC platform.

Next actions:

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of Renton, WA (Parks & Recreation, Human Services) · Salesforce HRAP Enhancement Project RFP

Salesforce HRAP (Home Repair Assistance Program) Enhancement Project · Closes October 2, 2026, 3:00 PM PT per the RFP notice and submission section (the RFP's own timeline and the City web page say October 9) — 7 days The City wants a "qualified Salesforce partner" with Salesforce certifications and two comparable Salesforce references; nothing in Summit Ridge Consulting's profile shows Salesforce certification, partnership or past projects, and no current partner fills it.

Facts

Scoring: Criteria listed without weights: technical expertise and understanding of the existing HRAP Salesforce environment; vendor experience, qualifications, references and team; completeness and quality of solution; cost and total cost of ownership; ability to meet schedule; training, documentation and support.

Scope match

Mandatory requirements Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet

1. Salesforce partner status — "seeking a qualified Salesforce partner" (unknown — need to confirm; not in profile).
2. "Relevant Salesforce Administrator, Developer, or Consultant certifications" (unknown — need to confirm).
3. "Two references for similar completed projects" — Salesforce/case-management implementations (none on record).
4. "knowledge of human and housing services workflows" (none on record).

Gate checks

Prime case

Teaming case

Neither HCH nor 628 Digital Design is a Salesforce partner. The needed partner type is a Salesforce consulting partner with public-sector case-management references; such a firm would prime, with Summit Ridge Consulting adding UX at most.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: Full RFP text (9 pages) via the City's Laserfiche viewer; City bids page; Starbridge listing. Not read: Excel scoring rubric and City standard contract template (attachments not located on the public page) — neither can supply the missing Salesforce credentials.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of Edgerton, Kansas · City Website Redesign & Codification System RFP

City Website Redesign and Codification System · Closes October 22, 2026, 4:00 PM CT — 27 days Short-listed firms must give "a live demonstration of the CMS" (create a page, publish an agenda, send an emergency alert), and the required feature set — agenda builder, alerts, auto-archiving, Tyler/CivicRec integrations, online codification — describes a packaged government-website product bought for under $30,000, not a custom build Summit Ridge Consulting can win profitably.

Facts

Scoring: No weights. Criteria: CMS ease of use, experience with municipal websites, technical requirements and features, approach, cost / 'ability to complete the work within the City's budget'. Short-list interview is a live CMS demonstration.

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. Summit Ridge Consulting would have to assemble a municipal CMS (agenda builder, alerts, retention archiving, codification) for less than $30K and then demo it against vendors who sell exactly that product.

Teaming case

Neither partner has a govtech CMS or codification service. The needed partner type is a municipal website platform vendor plus a code publisher; either would prime.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: Full RFP PDF (11 pages, via cloud text fetch) and the City bids page (no addenda). Not read: Nothing material. Unknowns: real question deadline; whether a WordPress-based build would be scored fairly.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Waccamaw Regional Transportation Authority (Coast RTA), SC · RFP #2026-001

Integrated Transit Technology Systems, Implementation, and Support · Closes October 9, 2026, 12:00 PM ET — 14 days Coast RTA wants an integrated transit technology solution for rider- and fleet-facing systems — the CAD/AVL, fare and passenger-information product space served by specialist transit vendors — and the RFP is only released by email request.

Facts

Scoring: Not stated in the material read.

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

No current partner offers transit ITS. The vendor type needed (transit technology provider) would prime; Summit Ridge Consulting could at most offer rider-app UX work to the winner.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: SC Business Opportunities ad (Sept 24 edition). Not read: RFP — only available by email request; the product-category fast kill decides it. Unknowns: value, term and budget not stated.

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The work requires sustained field data collection across 900 centerline miles in Suffolk, Virginia, which fails the New England on-site rule, and most of the scope is pavement engineering outside our service lines.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• On-site field collection in Virginia fails the hard disqualifier. This is a pass/fail failure and ends the bid.
• No ASTM D6433 pavement survey, imaging or retroreflectivity capability. This ends the bid.

Gate checks:

• Sustained on-site presence outside New England: FAIL. Hard disqualifier. Nothing we hold clears it.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL. Clears only by bidding the software slice under a pavement firm.
• Past performance: FAIL. Needs a partner's pavement references.

Teaming case: HCH adds analytics, data engineering, cloud and project management, but it is RI/MA-based and does not solve the Virginia problem. We would still lack ASTM surveys, imaging, retroreflectivity and field presence. A third partner is needed: a Virginia-capable pavement data collection and engineering firm. We would be a minor software sub, with six days to the close.

Win probability: Very low. The evaluation criteria are not in the provided text. The Q&A points to an incumbent: "Yes, 2023 collection of pavement and signs by video van" and "None contract required rebid." The City already runs Micropaver and Cityworks. Response effort is high against an unstated value, and our Virginia delivery capacity is zero.

Next actions:

1. CEO - record the no-bid and drop RFP 27019-AG from the pipeline - 2026-10-12
2. Capture manager - ask Amy Gardner about software-only sub roles, only if the CEO wants one pursued - 2026-10-15

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The stated place of performance is Fort Belvoir, VA, outside the six permitted New England states, and the client's inactive SAM.gov registration bars a federal award.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Active SAM.gov registration: the client's expired 2024-05-31. This is a pass/fail eligibility requirement for federal award and ends the bid until renewed.
• Performance location: Fort Belvoir, VA, with no remote option stated. This ends the bid as a hard disqualifier.
• Security clearance or CMMC level: unknown - need to confirm; the client holds none.
• DoD past performance: unknown - need to confirm; the client shows none.

Gate checks:

• Sustained on-site work outside New England (hard disqualifier): FAIL. Fort Belvoir, VA is the stated place of performance. Clearing it takes written confirmation of fully remote work.
• Scope outside six service lines: FAIL. Enterprise IT security and sustainment is outside them.
• Active SAM.gov: FAIL. Clearing it takes completing the renewal.
• Past performance: FAIL. The client has no DoD references.
• Clearance, CMMC or attestation: FAIL. A cleared partner would clear it.
• Verified MBE, HUBZone/8(a)/WOSB/SDVOSB, state registration, bonding or financials, key personnel: NOT APPLICABLE on the listing; the attachment is not provided and must be checked.

Prime case: The client cannot win as prime. It fails the hard disqualifier, is ineligible for award while SAM.gov is inactive, and has no DoD references, clearance or Virginia presence. Win confidence is capped at Low.

Next actions:

Dates are set at six months, 90 days and 30 days before the listed 2027-09-11 offers-due date.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Metropolitan Community College (Kansas City, MO) · RFP #1004-27

Web-Based Higher Education Case Management Solution Software · Closes September 28, 2026 (time not stated) — 3 days This buys an established SaaS product (student-conduct/CARE case management with Banner and Entra ID integration), not a custom build, and three days is too little runway.

Facts

Scoring: Not stated in the material read.

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. Summit Ridge Consulting has no case-management product, and a custom build would compete against mature, FERPA-ready SaaS on three days' notice.

Teaming case

No current partner has a case-management product (HCH's profile lists no case-management product). The needed partner type is an established higher-ed CARE/conduct SaaS vendor, which would prime on its own.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: Starbridge listing (description, close date, RFP number). Not read: RFP documents — none posted on the aggregator; the product-purchase fast kill and 3-day runway decide it. Unknowns: value, term and budget not stated.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Region 6 Education Service Center (EPIC6, TX) · AI Solutions – Products & Services

AI Solutions – Products & Services (EPIC6 cooperative, RFP #44.26) · Closes Listed by the aggregator as October 1, 2026 — no open solicitation found EPIC6 has already awarded its AI Solutions contract (#44.26) to about 49 vendors through October 2030, and AI is not on its current open-bid list — there is nothing live to bid.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No — nothing to submit.

Teaming case

None.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: esc6.net current/upcoming bid opportunities page and AI Solutions contract page (summary); Starbridge listing (no files). eMarketplace not checked (registration).

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The RFP requires proven AI invoice capture and Oracle EBS integration, which neither Summit Ridge Consulting nor HCH can evidence, and the RFP files are not available.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• "Demonstrated expertise in AI-powered invoice capture, workflow automation, and Oracle EBS integration." Neither firm has a matching reference. If the District scores this pass/fail, it ends the bid.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS on the listing text, which states no on-site requirement. Confirm in the full RFP.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL (Oracle EBS). Clearing it takes an Oracle EBS integrator or AP automation vendor partner.
• Past performance Summit Ridge Consulting cannot evidence: FAIL. Clearing it takes a partner with accepted AP automation and EBS references.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting can build workflow, routing and dashboards. It cannot show Oracle EBS integration, a 99%-accuracy capture product or a comparable reference. Prime fit is weak.

Teaming case: HCH adds analytics, data engineering, cloud/DevOps, project management and MBE/DBE/SBE status. It has no Oracle EBS or AP automation record. Together they still cannot cover Oracle EBS integration or AP automation references. A third partner is needed: an Oracle EBS integrator with AP automation delivery, or a licensed AP automation vendor already integrated with EBS.

Win probability: Low, about 5%. Evaluation criteria are not visible. Points go to proven AP automation and Oracle EBS references, and the wording "firms with demonstrated expertise in AI-powered invoice capture, workflow automation, and Oracle EBS integration" favors established AP vendors and EBS integrators. The effort of a new three-party team is high against an unstated value, with about six weeks to Nov 20 (eight days if Oct 15 is correct). Delivery capacity for touchless processing with live EBS integration is unproven.

Next actions: 2. Capture manager - Resolve the closing-date conflict (Nov 20 vs Oct 15) and request the RFP files for the record - 2026-10-07

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles · 81DMV-S3990

Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Services for DMV Transformation Effort (DTE) · Closes September 29, 2026, 2:00 PM PT — 4 days IV&V oversight of a statewide DMV system modernization is a specialist quality-assurance discipline outside Summit Ridge Consulting's six service lines, with four days left and a questions window long closed.

Facts

Scoring: Not stated in the material read.

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. Out-of-scope specialist oversight work with no time to build a credible IV&V methodology or references.

Teaming case

HCH offers program and project management but no stated IV&V practice. The needed partner type is an established state-government IV&V firm, which would prime without Summit Ridge Consulting.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: NevadaEPro bid detail page (header, amendments, attachment list). Not read: RFP (updated 9-9-26), SOW, Q&A and response workbooks — download consent needed; the out-of-scope fast kill decides it. Unknowns: contract value; on-site requirements.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Alabama Industrial Development Training (AIDT) · PS RFP — AIDT Enterprise Workforce Development System

AIDT Enterprise Workforce Development System · Closes October 15, 2026 (time not stated) — 20 days AIDT is buying an "Application Service Provider (ASP) web-based hosted solution" — an enterprise SaaS product for a state workforce agency — which Summit Ridge Consulting does not have.

Facts

Scoring: Not stated in the material read.

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. Product purchase for a statewide operation.

Teaming case

No current partner has a workforce-development SaaS product; the vendor type needed would prime.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: Starbridge listing (description and close date). Not read: RFP documents — not posted on the aggregator; the product-purchase fast kill decides it. Unknowns: value, term and budget not stated.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of Decatur (GA) · Website Strategy & Digital Accessibility Consultant RFQ

Website Strategy & Digital Accessibility Consultant (Request for Qualifications) · Closes Monday, October 5, 2026, 2:00 PM (ET) — 7 days

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No as scoped. It would become a narrow BID only if Summit Ridge Consulting has documented WCAG/Title II audit work and municipal website-refresh references, and the City confirms virtual facilitation.

Teaming case

HCH and 628 don't hold accessibility credentials; 628's facilitation covers New England. The missing partner is a credentialed digital-accessibility (Title II/WCAG) consultancy.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: City listing page, full 8-page RFQ PDF, open-bids index (no addenda).

← Back to the Report

NO GO - Work is performed at Fort Huachuca, AZ, the scope is Army systems engineering outside Summit Ridge Consulting's service lines, and Summit Ridge Consulting's SAM.gov registration is inactive.

Note: only the SAM.gov portal summary was readable. The full solicitation documents were not available, so the evaluation criteria, attachments, vehicle terms and on-site language are unconfirmed.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Active SAM.gov registration. Summit Ridge Consulting's registration expired 2024-05-31. This is a pass/fail requirement and it ends the bid.
• Past performance, key personnel, clearance and CMMC terms are unknown — need to confirm in the full documents. Summit Ridge Consulting holds none of these in its profile.

Gate checks:

• Sustained on-site work outside New England: FAIL. Fort Huachuca, AZ is outside the six acceptable states. This hard disqualifier is failed on the stated place of performance.
• Scope outside six service lines: FAIL. Clearing it takes a systems engineering partner.
• Active SAM.gov registration: FAIL. Clearing it takes completed renewal.
• Verified MBE certificate: NOT APPLICABLE.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: PASS. Only a small business set-aside is stated.
• State vendor registration: NOT APPLICABLE.
• Past performance: FAIL. Summit Ridge Consulting has no Army references. Clearing it takes a partner with them.
• Key personnel: NOT APPLICABLE on the summary; unknown — need to confirm.
• Clearance, CMMC, compliance attestation: FAIL. Summit Ridge Consulting holds none. Clearing it takes a cleared partner.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting cannot prime. It cannot receive an award while SAM.gov is inactive, it has no Army engineering past performance, and the work sits 2,500 miles from its base.

Win probability: Under 2%. The program title and the Fort Huachuca issuing office point to incumbent advantage. Response effort is high against an unstated value. Delivery capacity in Arizona is absent. Evaluation criteria are not visible in the summary.

Next actions:

1. CEO / capture lead - Decline the bid and confirm on-site and set-aside terms in the SAM.gov attachments for the record - 2026-10-02
2. CEO - Ask HCH whether it is pursuing TEIS IV and whether any prime needs Rhode Island-based software or AI subcontract work - 2026-10-07
3. Operations lead - Complete the SAM.gov renewal and MBE renewal paperwork - 2026-10-22

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The RFP is for utility-grade weather forecasting and meteorologist support, which neither Summit Ridge Consulting nor HCH delivers; only the dashboard layer fits.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Exhibit A product conformance matrix (about 60 items) and Exhibit B cloud questionnaire (FedRAMP, TX-RAMP, NIST 800-53, SOC 2). These are pass/fail, and Summit Ridge Consulting has no product or attestations. Failure ends the bid.
• Weather forecasting past performance and meteorologist key personnel. Responsibility includes "past performance". Failure ends the bid.
• Austin Finance Online vendor registration. Summit Ridge Consulting has none; this is clearable.
• Exhibit C, Exhibit D, notarized FACTA affidavit, wage theft and Texas statutory certifications. Summit Ridge Consulting's capacity to sign is unknown — need to confirm.
• Scope of Work, Terms and Conditions, price sheet and evaluation weights were not in the text provided.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, on-site work outside New England: PASS. No on-site requirement appears in the text provided; place of performance is unknown — need to confirm.
• Outside service lines: FAIL. Forecasting and meteorologist support.
• SAM.gov: NOT APPLICABLE. City solicitation.
• Verified MBE: PASS. Not required; the optional Small Business preference needs a City-recognized certification, and Summit Ridge Consulting's MBE has expired.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE.
• Vendor registration: FAIL. Austin registration required; clear by registering.
• Past performance: FAIL. Clear with a weather vendor teammate.
• Key personnel: FAIL. Clear with staffed meteorologists.
• Compliance attestation: FAIL. Clear with SOC 2 and TX-RAMP, or a vendor that holds them.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting cannot deliver forecasting or meteorologist support, the City's stated purpose. It fails past performance, personnel and attestation items. A dashboard-only offer is not responsive to a complete weather service.

Teaming case: HCH adds analytics, data engineering, cloud, dashboard and KPI experience, MBE/DBE/SBE status, ISO 9001 and HIPAA. Together they cover the dashboard, data pipeline and integration. They still lack forecasting, meteorologists, weather references, FedRAMP, TX-RAMP, SOC 2 and utility credibility. A third partner is required: an established weather intelligence vendor with utility customers. That vendor would be the prime, and none is engaged today.

Win probability: Under 5%. Evaluation weights sit in Section 11, which was cut off in the text provided. The "utility-grade" wording and the vendor-product questionnaires favor established utility weather vendors; no incumbent is named. Effort is high (matrix, questionnaire, five exhibits, notarized affidavit) against an unstated value, and delivery capacity for forecasting is zero.

Next actions:

1. CEO - Record the NO GO and do not start the response or register in Austin Finance Online - 2026-10-13
2. Capture manager - Optional 30-minute attendance at the pre-offer conference to see which weather vendors attend and whether dashboard subcontracting is allowed; pursue only if a weather vendor prime asks for Summit Ridge Consulting - 2026-10-13
3. Capture manager - Send a written question on subcontractor approval and place of performance only if a weather vendor prime has engaged Summit Ridge Consulting - 2026-10-15

← Back to the Report

NO GO — The Citadel (Charleston, SC) · RFP 27006-CC

Wargaming and Decision-Experimentation Software · Closes October 9, 2026, 2:00 PM ET — 14 days

Facts

Scoring: Technical approach 40% · Experience 20% · Cost 25% · Implementation, training and support 15%. Demo not scored; may be requested.

Scope match

Mandatory requirements Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet

1. South Carolina State Vendor Number — no expedited process; registration 'may take up to 30 days' (Q7).

Gate checks

Prime case

Teaming case

Neither partner has wargaming or simulation products. The needed partner type is an established wargaming/simulation software vendor, which would prime.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: RFP 27006-CC (first ~30% verbatim, remainder via summary) and Addendum 1 in full, via cloud text fetch; Citadel solicitations page. Unknowns: budget; reference requirements.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Mobile County, AL (Purchasing) · RFP 2-2026

Fully Managed Information Technology (IT) Services for Mobile County Community Corrections Center · Closes October 7, 2026, 10:00 AM CT — 12 days Fully managed IT services for a corrections facility in Alabama is help-desk and infrastructure work outside Summit Ridge Consulting's service lines, and it almost certainly needs hands-on support in Mobile.

Facts

Scoring: Not stated in the material read.

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. Wrong service line, wrong geography.

Teaming case

HCH does managed IT and 24/7 monitoring but is RI/MA-concentrated; an Alabama managed-service provider would be the natural bidder. Not worth Summit Ridge Consulting's effort.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: Mobile County bids page listing (title, number, dates). Not read: Specifications attachment — download consent needed; the out-of-scope fast kill decides it. Unknowns: value, term and budget not stated.

← Back to the Report

NO GO - The only source is a listing stub with no documents, criteria or stated requirements, and Summit Ridge Consulting cannot verify fit, Florida registration or references before the 2026-10-21 close.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• The listing states "No files attached to this RFP." Every requirement is unknown — need to confirm.
• Summit Ridge Consulting's profile lists no government past performance reference. If the RFP makes references pass/fail, that ends the bid.
• Florida is not among Summit Ridge Consulting's registered vendor states. A required Broward or Florida registration Summit Ridge Consulting cannot complete before close ends the bid.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: place of performance not stated, so the check is unresolved. Required Florida on-site presence ends the bid.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS on the title; "systems" is undefined.
• SAM.gov: not stated. Summit Ridge Consulting's registration expired 2024-05-31. Clearing it means completing renewal.
• Verified MBE: not stated. Summit Ridge Consulting's MBE is expired and in renewal as of 18 Sep 2026. Clearing it means finishing renewal and confirming the certifying body and number.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: no set-aside stated. Summit Ridge Consulting holds none.
• State vendor registration: not stated. Florida is not on Summit Ridge Consulting's list. Clearing it means registering.
• Past performance: not stated. Summit Ridge Consulting shows no references.
• Key personnel and credentials: not stated.
• Clearance, CMMC, attestations: not stated.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting's AI service lines match the title. Summit Ridge Consulting has no evidenced county-government references, no Florida registration and no Florida presence. A sub-$1M firm has 14 days to answer an RFP it cannot yet read. Prime viability cannot be shown.

Teaming case: HCH Enterprises adds MBE/DBE/SBE status, ISO 9001:2015, HIPAA verification, cloud, DevOps, data engineering and RI public-sector past performance. HCH is concentrated in RI and MA and holds no Florida vehicle. The pair still lacks Florida presence, Broward references and a Florida registration. If the county wants a commercial AI platform, the team needs a third partner: an AI platform vendor with Florida government references.

Win probability: Low. Evaluation criteria are not stated, so scoring points cannot be mapped. The listing contains no wording written around an incumbent. Award value is not stated, so effort against return cannot be sized. The same-titled Florida State University ITN 6769-4 is a different buyer and says nothing about Broward's terms.

Next actions: 2. CEO - re-evaluate only if the documents show remote delivery, no registration or reference barrier, and AI-services-only scope - 2026-10-14

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of Jackson (MS) · RFP 20477-092226

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System · Closes October 6, 2026, 3:30 PM CT (moved from Sept 22) — 8 days A commercial cloud ERP purchase with implementation — Summit Ridge Consulting sells no ERP product and no partner supplies one.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No.

Teaming case

None — the gap is an ERP software publisher. After award, Summit Ridge Consulting could pitch the winner on integrations or data migration.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: jacksonmsbids.com public notice (fast kill). Not read: RFP files and addendum (portal registration required); they don't change a product-purchase verdict.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of North Las Vegas, NV · NGEM-RFP 2026-024 (NevadaEPro CTYNLV-S4022)

Customer Portal & AMI Technology · Closes October 19, 2026, 1:00 PM PT — 24 days The City is buying a utility customer portal plus AMI (advanced metering) and mobile workforce management solution — a utility-technology product stack, not a custom build Summit Ridge Consulting can prime.

Facts

Scoring: Not stated in the material read.

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. The core of the award is utility metering and field-workforce technology, which Summit Ridge Consulting does not sell.

Teaming case

Neither HCH nor 628 Digital Design covers AMI or utility workforce management. The needed partner type is a utility CIS/AMI vendor, which would prime; Summit Ridge Consulting could at most pitch portal UX work to the winner after award.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: NevadaEPro bid detail page (description, dates, mandatory meeting, attachment list). Not read: 'NGEM Information' attachment and full RFP — download consent needed; the out-of-scope fast kill decides it. Unknowns: whether the portal could be separately awarded; value.

← Back to the Report

NO GO - No solicitation documents are attached, the response is due in 8 days, and Summit Ridge Consulting has no housing-authority past performance or Texas presence, so no requirement can be confirmed or met in time.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Housing or HCV past performance: none in the Summit Ridge Consulting or HCH profiles. If the RFP makes references pass/fail, that ends the bid.
• SAM.gov: Summit Ridge Consulting's registration is inactive, expired 2024-05-31.
• Texas registration: Texas is not on Summit Ridge Consulting's registered list.

Gate checks:

• On-site presence outside New England (hard disqualifier): NOT APPLICABLE. Place of performance is not stated; unknown — need to confirm. To clear: confirm remote delivery in the RFP.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS. Workflow automation fits; platform licensing is a partial fit.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE. No set-aside is stated.
• Past performance Summit Ridge Consulting cannot evidence: FAIL. No housing or HCV reference exists. To clear: add a partner with PHA or HUD-program references.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting covers workflow automation, UI/UX and custom development. It lacks HCV references, a Texas presence, active SAM.gov status and knowledge of the incumbent HCV system. Prime fit is weak.

Teaming case: HCH Enterprises adds MBE/DBE/SBE status, HIPAA verification, data engineering, cloud and DevOps, help desk, contact-center-as-a-service and program management. The combined team still has no housing-authority references, no licensed engagement platform and no Texas footprint. A third partner would need to be a PHA or HUD-program technology firm with Texas references. Contracting one in 8 days is not realistic.

Win probability: Low, about 5%. Evaluation criteria are not stated, so scoring points cannot be mapped. The wording "operate alongside, rather than replace, the Authority’s existing HCV system of record" favors a vendor already familiar with that system. Response effort is high against an unstated value, and Summit Ridge Consulting has no evidenced Austin capacity.

Next actions:

1. Capture manager - Request the full RFP package from the Authority or Starbridge file retrieval and confirm on-site, SAM.gov, registration and reference requirements; close the file if nothing arrives - 2026-10-09
2. CEO - Ask HCH Enterprises for a PHA or HUD-program technology firm in Texas for future teaming - 2026-10-14
3. Summit Ridge Consulting operations lead - Finish MBE and SAM.gov renewals so later housing-authority bids are not blocked - 2026-10-15

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Town of Dalton (MA) · Town Database Services RFP

Request for Proposals for Town Database Services (archival database) · Closes Wednesday, October 21, 2026, 2:00 PM (ET) — 23 days The Town wants a hosted archival-database product from a firm with ten years of municipal database services, capped at $12,000 a year — Summit Ridge Consulting fails the mandatory experience and the value doesn't support a custom build.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. Summit Ridge Consulting cannot certify ten years of municipal database services or four comparable implementations.

Teaming case

No current partner holds a municipal records/archival database product. Not a TEAM filing.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: listing page and RFP PDF pages 1–18 verbatim (pages 19–32, attachments B–F, via fetch summary).

← Back to the Report

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, on-site work outside New England: PASS. Haverhill is in Massachusetts.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL. The inspection element matches no Summit Ridge Consulting service line. To clear it, the RFP would have to be software-only.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting can build a reporting web application. It cannot perform or certify fire alarm inspections. The scope and criteria are unseen, and Summit Ridge Consulting has no evidenced municipal fire-safety reference. Score: low.

Teaming case: HCH adds Massachusetts presence, MBE status, data engineering and project management. It has no fire alarm inspection capability. The combined team cannot perform licensed inspections. A third partner would be needed: a licensed fire alarm inspection and testing contractor. Score: low.

Win probability: Low. The evaluation criteria are not stated, and the listing contains no incumbent-specific wording. Response effort is unknown against an unknown award value. Six days is too short to assemble a partner and a compliant response. Delivery capacity for inspection is zero.

Next actions: 3. CEO - If the RFP is software-only, ask HCH whether it will join before the 10:00 AM closing. Otherwise archive - 2026-10-09

← Back to the Report

NO GO — City of Cortland, NY · CR 2138642

RFQ — Cybersecurity Consulting & Assessment Services for the City Water and Wastewater Infrastructure · Closed September 25, 2026, 12:00 PM ET — 0 days The response deadline passed at noon today; the listing is marked CLOSED.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. Deadline passed, and scope is outside Summit Ridge Consulting's service lines.

Teaming case

Not assessed. For future water/wastewater cyber RFQs, HCH Enterprises (cyber assessments, pen testing) is the natural prime, with Summit Ridge Consulting as a subcontractor at most.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: Starbridge listing (status CLOSED, due Sep 25, 2026, 12:00 PM, CR 2138642). Not read: "Cybersecurity Assessment RFQ" PDF (gated by Starbridge file-access request) — fast kill on deadline; the document cannot change the verdict. Unknowns: none material.

← Back to the Report

NO GO — Maryland (eMMA) · SW PORFP (SBR), number not public

Nintex Docgen Implementation (Small Business Reserve) · Closes September 25, 2026, 2:00 PM EDT — 0 days (about one hour after this screen) It closes within the hour, the documents sit behind an eMMA/BidNet login, and the scope is implementation of a named commercial product.

Facts

Scope match

Gate checks

Prime case

No. No time, no documents, and a named-product implementation where Nintex partners hold the advantage.

Teaming case

Not assessed.

Win probability

Not assessed — Summit Ridge Consulting is not a viable prime.

Actions

Sources read: Summit Ridge Consulting RFP dashboard row (title, SBR set-aside, close date/time). Not read: the solicitation itself — login-gated, and the deadline makes the verdict certain. Unknowns: issuing agency, value.

← Back to the Report

NO GO - This is a Hitachi storage hardware purchase, outside all of Summit Ridge Consulting's service lines, and neither Summit Ridge Consulting nor HCH shows reseller capability.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Authorization or ability to supply Hitachi storage products. Neither Summit Ridge Consulting nor HCH evidences it. This is a pass/fail requirement for any hardware bid and ends the bid.
• Physical submission in White Plains by 2:00 PM EDT on 2026-10-08. The bid forms and the 56-item document request list were not provided: unknown — need to confirm.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS. A delivery point is stated and no sustained on-site work is stated. Installation scope is unknown — need to confirm.
• Scope outside Summit Ridge Consulting's service lines: FAIL. It is not clearable without becoming a hardware reseller.
• State vendor registration: NOT APPLICABLE on the visible text. New York is not named in Summit Ridge Consulting's registered states: unknown — need to confirm.

Prime case: Poor. Summit Ridge Consulting has no hardware line and no evidenced Hitachi authorization. A Formal RFB is awarded on price to a compliant bidder, and Summit Ridge Consulting cannot compete on price for product it does not resell.

Teaming case: HCH adds IT managed services, cloud and DevOps, and contract vehicles, but none of it is Hitachi storage resale. HCH's footprint is concentrated in RI and MA. The combined team still cannot supply Hitachi hardware. A third partner would be needed: an authorized Hitachi reseller. That reseller would bid as prime and give Summit Ridge Consulting no role. Four days remain, which is too short to assemble a team.

Win probability: Very low. Award value is not stated. The listing's wording does not point to an incumbent. Points are won on price and product authorization, where Summit Ridge Consulting has neither. Response effort is not justified, and delivery capacity for hardware is none.

Next actions:

← Back to the Report

TEAM - A data platform build fits Summit Ridge Consulting only with HCH Enterprises covering data engineering and cloud, and the full RFP, which we have not read, must confirm no sustained on-site work outside New England.

Caveat: This memo rests on the SAM.gov portal summary only. The full RFP was not available.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• SAM.gov registration: Summit Ridge Consulting is inactive, expired 2024-05-31. Whether USAC requires it is unknown — need to confirm. If it is required, it is pass/fail and ends the bid for Summit Ridge Consulting as prime.
• Past performance on enterprise data platforms: Summit Ridge Consulting has none evidenced. Unknown whether references are required — need to confirm.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: unknown. Place of performance is not stated. If the full RFP requires it, the bid ends.
• SAM.gov registration: FAIL (scored flag). Clearing it takes renewal, or HCH as prime.
• Past performance: FAIL (scored flag). Clearing it takes HCH references.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS for the build; a vendor licence would fall outside.

Teaming case: HCH adds data engineering, cloud and DevOps, analytics, program management, MBE status, ISO 9001:2015 and Medicare/Medicaid data past performance. Summit Ridge Consulting adds custom software, UI/UX and AI workflow automation. HCH is the stronger prime while Summit Ridge Consulting SAM is inactive. The team still lacks USF experience, federal security attestations and proven large-scale capacity. A third partner with enterprise data platform and federal compliance credentials is the likely need.

Win probability: Low. Evaluation criteria and incumbent information are unavailable, and nothing in the summary reads as written around an incumbent. Points are won on technical approach and platform references and lost on past performance and compliance. The window is 41 days from posting, which is workable for a teamed response but heavy against an unknown award value. Summit Ridge Consulting delivery capacity is thin for an enterprise platform.

Next actions: 2. Summit Ridge Consulting CEO - Open teaming talks with HCH on prime-versus-sub and a third partner, and decide go or stop against the full RFP - 2026-11-02 3. Summit Ridge Consulting CEO with HCH - Sign the teaming agreement and lock references and pricing, one week before the deadline - 2026-11-16

← Back to the Report

TEAM - The CIS is a web build Summit Ridge Consulting can deliver, but the DBE and compliance-tracking track record and certification weight require HCH, and the RFP documents are not yet reviewed.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Comparable past performance: Summit Ridge Consulting has no evidenced reference for a compliance or DBE tracking system. If SANDAG makes it pass/fail, it ends the bid.
• DBE or SB certification of the prime: Summit Ridge Consulting's MBE is expired. HCH holds MBE, DBE and SBE; California recognition is unknown — need to confirm.
• On-site work in San Diego: not stated. Sustained on-site work there fails the hard disqualifier and ends the bid.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: NOT APPLICABLE for now. No on-site requirement is stated. Confirm remote delivery.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS. Custom product expectation is unknown.
• SAM.gov: NOT APPLICABLE. None stated. Summit Ridge Consulting's SAM is inactive; renewal is in progress.
• Verified MBE: NOT APPLICABLE. None stated. Clear it by finishing renewal or using HCH.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: PASS. None listed.
• State registration: NOT APPLICABLE. California is not on Summit Ridge Consulting's list. Confirm.
• Past performance: FAIL. No comparable reference. Clear it with HCH's dashboard and fund-management experience, if SANDAG accepts it.
• Key personnel: NOT APPLICABLE. unknown — need to confirm.
• Clearance, CMMC, attestation: NOT APPLICABLE. unknown — need to confirm.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting can build the application and reporting in Agile sprints. It has no comparable reference, no existing CIS product, an expired MBE, an inactive SAM registration and limited capacity for a ten-year commitment. Prime is not recommended.

Teaming case: Summit Ridge Consulting builds and HCH contributes MBE/DBE/SBE status, analytics, data engineering, cloud and DevOps, help desk, cybersecurity and project management. The team still has no DBE compliance-system reference and no product. If SANDAG requires a proven commercial CIS, a third partner owning one is needed.

Win probability: Low, about 10-15% as a team. Evaluation criteria are in documents not yet reviewed. Points are won and lost on comparable experience and product fit. No incumbent-tilted wording appears in the listing. Effort is justified only if remote delivery and a custom build are confirmed.

Next actions:

← Back to the Report

TEAM — Rhode Island Commerce Corporation · RFP-2615

Household Income Verification Services and Platform (ASAP 2.0) · Closes October 6, 2026, 11:59 PM ET — 11 days Summit Ridge Consulting can build and host the platform, but the RFP also asks for "demonstrated experience providing income verification services," which Summit Ridge Consulting does not have; pair with HCH (RI health-and-human-services past performance, helpline, MBE points) and pursue.

Facts

Scoring: Company Experience and Results 20 · Personnel 20 · Strategic Thinking/Planning 20 · PII Handling and Data Security 20 · Budget/Cost Effectiveness 20 · up to 6 bonus points for ISBE (MBE/WBE/DisBE) participation.

Scope match

Mandatory requirements Summit Ridge Consulting cannot meet

1. Demonstrated experience providing income verification services (and IRS forms knowledge).
2. Client references for verification work — unknown; need to confirm.

Gate checks

Prime case

Conditionally. Summit Ridge Consulting can deliver the platform, reporting and security, and scores well as a local firm on Strategic Thinking and Budget. It cannot show income-verification experience alone, which costs points under Experience and Personnel.

Teaming case

• HCH Enterprises: RI EOHHS/RIDOH/Medicaid program-management past performance, contact-center helpline, security policy and incident response, and MBE bonus points if its ODEO certification is current. HCH could run verification staffing; Summit Ridge Consulting builds and hosts the platform. Either firm could prime — pick whichever has the stronger eligibility-verification references.
• 628 Digital Design: multilingual notices and applicant-facing content; its W/MBE counts only if ODEO-certified.
• Still missing: a firm with direct income-verification or tax-document review history. If HCH can't show it, name a benefits-eligibility processing firm as a sub.

Win probability

Moderate. Small budget and home-state status narrow the field; five equal criteria reward a clear security plan and plan quality. Points lost on experience unless the team shows eligibility-verification references. Effort ~5–7 person-days. Price the platform on low-code/cloud components and keep verification labor per-application to fit $150K; state written assumptions on volume (~100/year).

Actions

Sources read: RFP-2615 PDF on purchasing.ri.gov (full text, via a text-extraction fetch in the cloud). Not read: Q&A addendum (not yet published — due Sep 29). Unknowns: HCH's income-verification references and RI ODEO certification; whether the addendum changes scope; exact issue date.

← Back to the Report

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

Gate checks:

• Sustained on-site work outside New England (hard disqualifier): PASS, provisional. No on-site requirement appears in the captured text. Sustained on-site language in the RFP would turn this into a FAIL and a NO GO.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL (flag). Infrastructure and cybersecurity assessment needs HCH.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE.
• Past performance, key personnel, clearance or compliance attestation: unknown - need to confirm.

Win probability: Low as the facts stand. Evaluation criteria are not captured, and the City says RFPs allow evaluation "beyond cost", which favors municipal experience, where this team is weakest. No incumbent-specific wording appears. Effort is high against an unstated value. Delivery capacity is adequate for remote-led work with short site visits. The odds rise if the scope is strategy-heavy and remote-friendly.

Next actions:

← Back to the Report

TEAM - The core work is custom web software that Summit Ridge Consulting builds, but an eight-year child-health case management system needs HIPAA credentials and comparable references that Summit Ridge Consulting lacks, and the closing date conflicts (Oct 7 vs Dec 9, 2026).

Caveat: only the portal summary was readable. No bid documents were attached, so every requirement below is unconfirmed.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• Closing date: the listings conflict. An Oct 7 close is today and ends the window.
• Past performance: Summit Ridge Consulting has no case management reference, and HCH has none. If the bid requires one as pass/fail, that ends the bid for Summit Ridge Consulting alone.
• Compliance attestation: Summit Ridge Consulting holds no HIPAA attestation. HCH does.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, on-site presence outside New England: NOT APPLICABLE. Place not stated and the work is web-based. A sustained New Jersey on-site requirement forces NO GO.
• Scope outside service lines: PASS, apart from translation.
• SAM.gov: NOT APPLICABLE. SAM is inactive; no federal requirement shown.
• Verified MBE: NOT APPLICABLE. Summit Ridge Consulting's MBE is expired and in renewal; HCH holds MBE.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: NOT APPLICABLE.
• State registration: PASS. Summit Ridge Consulting is registered in New Jersey.
• Past performance: FAIL. Clearing it takes a partner with a delivered case management system.
• Key personnel: NOT APPLICABLE. Unknown — need to confirm.
• Compliance attestation: FAIL. Clearing it takes HCH as HIPAA-verified partner.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting builds the application and portal but lacks a comparable reference, a HIPAA attestation and long-term support capacity. Weak as prime.

Teaming case: Summit Ridge Consulting leads on development, UI/UX and requirements. HCH adds HIPAA verification, MBE/SBE status, analytics, cloud and DevOps, managed services, help desk and program management. The team still lacks a case management reference. A third partner with a delivered state health or human services case management system fills that gap. A language-services vendor is needed only if translation is in scope.

Win probability: Low. Evaluation weights are not visible. Points are typically won on comparable references and domain depth, where Summit Ridge Consulting and HCH are weakest. No incumbent wording appears in the summary. The effort for a custom system with an eight-year term is large and the value is not stated. An Oct 7 close makes the bid infeasible.

Next actions:

1. Capture manager - confirm the closing date, question deadline and bid document source with NJ Division of Purchase and Property - 2026-10-07
2. CEO - open teaming talks with HCH and a case management reference partner, with signed agreements 30 days before the Dec 9 close - 2026-11-09

← Back to the Report

TEAM - The title scope overlaps Summit Ridge Consulting's AI and software lines, but a multi-state NASPO master agreement needs breadth, references and registrations that Summit Ridge Consulting lacks alone, and HCH covers part of that gap.

Caveat: only the portal summary was readable. The full RFP was not available, so scope, forms and pass/fail criteria are unverified.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• The RFP forms, references, financial statements, key persons and pass/fail criteria are unread: unknown - need to confirm. One failed pass/fail requirement ends the bid regardless of technical score.
• Oklahoma vendor registration is registered_pending_activation. If the RFP requires active registration at submission, that ends the bid until it is activated.
• SAM.gov is inactive and the MBE is expired and under renewal. Whether the RFP requires either is unknown - need to confirm.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, on-site work outside New England: NOT APPLICABLE. No place of performance is stated. Unknown - need to confirm.
• Scope outside service lines: NOT APPLICABLE. Only the title is available.
• State vendor registration: FAIL. Oklahoma is pending activation. Clearing it takes activation before submission.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting is weak as prime. Its AI strategy and AI-native build lines fit the title. It is a sub-$1M firm with no evidenced multi-state references, a pending Oklahoma registration, an expired MBE and an inactive SAM.gov registration.

Next actions: 3. Summit Ridge Consulting operations lead - Activate the Oklahoma vendor registration and decide on submission ahead of the 3 p.m. CT close - 2026-10-12

← Back to the Report

TEAM - Summit Ridge Consulting can design and build the City's website, but hosting and ongoing support need HCH, and only the portal summary was readable.

Caveat: the full RFP was not available. This memo rests on the portal summary only. Everything the summary omits is marked unknown — need to confirm.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• The profile holds no municipal website reference for Summit Ridge Consulting or HCH. If the RFP sets references as pass/fail, that ends the response.
• Summit Ridge Consulting's registration on the City's Bid & RFP webpage is unknown — need to confirm.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS. The summary describes a vendor-hosted site and states no on-site duty. Confirm in the full RFP.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL. Hosting and support need HCH.
• SAM.gov: PASS. Not mentioned. Summit Ridge Consulting's registration is inactive.
• Verified MBE: PASS. Not mentioned. Summit Ridge Consulting's MBE is expired and in renewal. HCH holds MBE.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: PASS. No set-aside stated.
• State registration: FAIL. Oregon is not a Summit Ridge Consulting registered state. Whether it is required is unknown — need to confirm.
• Past performance: FAIL. No municipal website or CMS reference is evidenced.
• Key personnel: not applicable on the summary. Unknown — need to confirm.
• Clearance, CMMC, compliance attestation: not applicable on the summary. The accessibility standard is unknown — need to confirm.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting delivers design, UX and custom build. It has no hosting, managed support or evidenced CMS work. Hosting and support sit at the core of the award, so a solo response scores weak on operations.

Teaming case: Summit Ridge Consulting leads as prime. HCH adds cloud and DevOps hosting, managed services, help desk, project management and MBE/DBE/SBE status. The team still lacks municipal website references, accessibility audit credentials and Oregon presence. A platform reseller or accessibility specialist would close those gaps. HCH's footprint is concentrated in RI and MA, so confirm Oregon-hours support.

Win probability: 15 to 20 percent on the summary alone. Evaluation criteria are not stated. The summary contains no incumbent-specific wording, and the current site is an unsupported in-house Drupal build. Competitors will be municipal web specialists with local references. Value is not stated. The 26-day window supports a full proposal with HCH.

Next actions: 2. Summit Ridge Consulting CEO - confirm HCH as hosting and support subcontractor, with Oregon support hours and web references - 2026-10-09 3. Summit Ridge Consulting capture lead - submit written questions to Teo Ramirez on on-site work, Oregon registration, references and budget - 2026-10-13

← Back to the Report

TEAM - The IT consulting and management scope fits Summit Ridge Consulting's advisory lines only in part, managed services need HCH, and the full RFP is unread.

Caveat: only the portal summary was available. No RFP documents are attached, so every call below rests on a one-line scope title.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: place of performance is not stated. The buyer is in New Jersey, so sustained on-site work there fails this check and ends the pursuit. Unknown — need to confirm.
• Scope outside service lines: FAIL as a scored flag. "Management Services" can mean managed IT or help desk. Clearing it takes HCH or a narrow consulting scope.
• NJ vendor registration: NJ is on Summit Ridge Consulting's registered list. Confirm it meets the RFP.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting can deliver advisory, AI and software work. It cannot deliver managed IT or help desk. It has no evidenced public housing reference, its SAM is inactive and its MBE is expired. Prime works only for a narrow consulting scope.

Win probability: Low to moderate, unrated until the RFP is read. Evaluation criteria and value are not stated, and nothing reads as written around an incumbent. The 33-day window since release is short, and the housing authority award is likely small, so effort must stay low. Summit Ridge Consulting wins points on AI and software depth and a partner-backed team. It loses points on local and housing references.

Next actions: 2. CEO - call HCH to confirm role and NJ presence; make the final go decision after the on-site check - 2026-10-08 3. Capture manager - submit the proposal with HCH as subcontractor, one day before the close - 2026-10-13

← Back to the Report

TEAM - Summit Ridge Consulting fits the design, UX and CMS build, but hosting, security and incident response need HCH, and Summit Ridge Consulting has not shown the three launched websites the RFP requires.

Mandatory requirements the client cannot meet:

• "Examples of at least three relevant websites launched within the past five years." The client profile shows none. This is a pass/fail minimum qualification: if neither Summit Ridge Consulting nor HCH can supply three, it ends the bid regardless of technical score.
• Key personnel with documented accessibility and cybersecurity expertise: unknown — need to confirm. HCH covers cybersecurity.

Gate checks:

• Hard disqualifier, sustained on-site work outside New England: PASS. No on-site requirement is stated; confirm in questions.
• Outside service lines: FAIL (hosting, incident response, migration). Clear with HCH.
• SAM.gov: PASS, not required.
• Verified MBE: PASS, not required.
• HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB: PASS, none required.
• State registration: FAIL. Missouri authorization is not held. File before award.
• Past performance: FAIL. Three website references are not evidenced.
• Key personnel: FAIL. No accessibility specialist is named.
• Clearance or CMMC: PASS, none stated.

Prime case: Summit Ridge Consulting covers discovery, UX and CMS build with its own lines. It lacks website references, Missouri registration, an accessibility credential and any hosting capability. Prime viability is low.

Teaming case: Summit Ridge Consulting leads with HCH as subcontractor. HCH adds managed services and help desk, cloud and DevOps hosting, cybersecurity and incident response, and project management. The team still cannot show three public-sector websites, because HCH's past performance is health program work. If neither firm holds the references, add a government-web firm or an accessibility auditor as a third partner.

Win probability: about 20% on a teamed bid. Criteria are approach 25%, experience and references 20%, accessibility, security and support 20%, team and schedule 15%, cost 20%. Summit Ridge Consulting loses points on references and wins on approach and price. No incumbent-specific wording appears. Value is unstated and the effort is moderate, so a small award is likely. Bid only if three references are confirmed.

Next actions: 3. Summit Ridge Consulting proposal lead - courier 4 sealed bound copies to Neosho with delivery confirmation - 2026-11-09